OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 24.05.2026, 22:37

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Digitalizing English-language CT Interpretation for Positive Haemorrhage Evaluation Reporting: the DECIPHER study

2025·0 Zitationen·BMJ Health & Care InformaticsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

9

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Identifying whether there is a traumatic intracranial bleed (ICB+) on head CT is critical for clinical care and research. Free text CT reports are unstructured and therefore must undergo time-consuming manual review. Existing artificial intelligence classification schemes are not optimised for the emergency department endpoint of classification of ICB+ or ICB-. We sought to assess three methods for classifying CT reports: a text classification (TC) programme, a commercial natural language processing programme (Clinithink) and a generative pretrained transformer large language model (Digitalizing English-language CT Interpretation for Positive Haemorrhage Evaluation Reporting (DECIPHER)-LLM). METHODS: Primary objective: determine the diagnostic classification performance of the dichotomous categorisation of each of the three approaches. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: determine whether the LLM could achieve a substantial reduction in CT report review workload while maintaining 100% sensitivity.Anonymised radiology reports of head CT scans performed for trauma were manually labelled as ICB+/-. Training and validation sets were randomly created to train the TC and natural language processing models. Prompts were written to train the LLM. RESULTS: 898 reports were manually labelled. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI)) of TC, Clinithink and DECIPHER-LLM (with probability of ICB set at 10%) were respectively 87.9% (76.7% to 95.0%) and 98.2% (96.3% to 99.3%), 75.9% (62.8% to 86.1%) and 96.2% (93.8% to 97.8%) and 100% (93.8% to 100%) and 97.4% (95.3% to 98.8%).With DECIPHER-LLM probability of ICB+ threshold of 10% set to identify CT reports requiring manual evaluation, CT reports requiring manual classification reduced by an estimated 385/449 cases (85.7% (95% CI 82.1% to 88.9%)) while maintaining 100% sensitivity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: DECIPHER-LLM outperformed other tested free-text classification methods.

Ähnliche Arbeiten