Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Readability of Pediatric Otolaryngology Information: Comparing AI‐Generated Content With Google Search Results
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates and compares the readability of pediatric otolaryngology patient education materials generated by ChatGPT4o and those retrieved from Google searches. The goal is to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content improves accessibility compared to institutionally affiliated online resources. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional readability analysis. SETTING: Online educational materials focused on pediatric otolaryngology topics. METHODS: Educational articles covering 10 pediatric otolaryngology conditions were sourced either via Google search or generated using ChatGPT4o. All texts were standardized by removing extraneous formatting. Readability was assessed using six validated metrics: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Gunning-Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index (ARI). Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to evaluate differences in scores between sources. RESULTS: ChatGPT4o-generated content demonstrated significantly higher FKGL, Gunning-Fog, ARI, and SMOG scores and lower FRES scores compared to Google-sourced materials, indicating greater complexity (P < .05). These differences were most pronounced for simpler conditions such as allergic rhinitis and otitis externa. For more complex topics like laryngomalacia and cleft lip and palate, readability scores were not significantly different between the two sources (P > .05). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT4o-generated patient education materials are generally more difficult to read than Google-sourced content, especially for less complex conditions. Given the importance of readability in patient education, AI-generated materials may require further refinement to improve accessibility without compromising accuracy. Enhancing clarity could increase the utility of AI tools for educating parents and caregivers in pediatric otolaryngology.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
2006 · 6.285 Zit.
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
2004 · 6.265 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.947 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.319 Zit.
Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century
2000 · 5.034 Zit.