Ivan Buljan

How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community

2018 · 43 Zit. · Accountability in Research

Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study

2021 · 40 Zit. · Science and Public Policy

Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review

2022 · 38 Zit. · Accountability in Research

Attitudes and Knowledge About Plagiarism Among University Students: Cross-Sectional Survey at the University of Split, Croatia

2018 · 34 Zit. · Science and Engineering Ethics

Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts

2021 · 30 Zit. · Accountability in Research

Using ChatGPT to Improve the Presentation of Plain Language Summaries of Cochrane Systematic Reviews About Oncology Interventions: Cross-Sectional Study

2025 · 6 Zit. · JMIR Cancer

Ethics issues identified by applicants and ethics experts in Horizon 2020 grant proposals

2021 · 6 Zit. · F1000Research

Ethics issues identified by applicants and ethics experts in Horizon 2020 grant proposals

2021 · 4 Zit. · F1000Research

Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study

2021 · 4 Zit.

Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers

2022 · 3 Zit.

Publication integrity viewed from different perspectives

2022 · 0 Zit. · PUBMET

Classification of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries by Conclusiveness Using Transformer-Based Models and ChatGPT: Retrospective Observational Study

2026 · 0 Zit. · JMIR Medical Informatics