Daisuke Matsubara

What's the difference between human‐written manuscripts versus ChatGPT‐generated manuscripts involving “human touch”?

2025 · 19 Zit. · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research

Regulations of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> use in paper writing: Based on beliefs or practical inevitability?

2024 · 2 Zit. · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Research misconduct: Use of generative artificial intelligence in writing may lower the threshold

2024 · 2 Zit. · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

The Worst‐Case Scenario After <scp>AI</scp> Use in Academic Writing: A Clever User Wins?

2024 · 2 Zit. · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

ChatGPT use in daily obstetrics and gynecology practice: clarification and recommendations

2024 · 2 Zit. · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Human‐ Versus ChatGPT‐Generated Abstracts: Some Concerns and Suggestions

2024 · 1 Zit. · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Impact of artificial intelligence in paper writing on academia: Considering “Author Who?”

2025 · 1 Zit. · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

ChatGPT-Generated Letters: Hypothetical Opinion From a Girl and Editor's Reply on Child Life Specialist in Japan

2024 · 0 Zit. · Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Invisible demerits of ChatGPT in medical writing

2025 · 0 Zit. · Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology