Ikenobo Junior College

Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills

Horacio Rivera, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2021 · 80 Zit.

Is ChatGPT a valid author?

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 72 Zit.

Ending the retraction stigma: Encouraging the reporting of errors in the biomedical record

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Aceil Al‐Khatib

2019 · 52 Zit.

Human‐ and <scp>AI</scp>‐based authorship: Principles and ethics

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Panagiotis Tsigaris

2023 · 31 Zit.

Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2021 · 27 Zit.

Can ChatGPT rescue or assist with language barriers in healthcare communication?

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 24 Zit.

ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors’ and Publishers’ Responsibilities

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 21 Zit.

Reasons for citing retracted literature are not straightforward, and solutions are complex

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2020 · 16 Zit.

GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing

Yana Suchikova, Natalia Tsybuliak, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.

2025 · 14 Zit.

How are authors’ contributions verified in the ICMJE model?

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 9 Zit.

Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets

2023 · 8 Zit.

Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2022 · 7 Zit.

What does ChatGPT advise about predatory publishing?

Panagiotis Tsigaris, Graham Kendall, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 6 Zit.

Linguistic precision, and declared use of ChatGPT, needed for radiology literature

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

2023 · 6 Zit.

Letters to the editor generated by AI in neuroscience: The role of neuroethics

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Timothy Daly

2025 · 5 Zit.