Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies – a synthesis of systematic review findings
525
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2008
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies. Data sources/study setting Systematic reviews in full text, English language, 1987-2007, reporting any measure of clinical process change or cost-benefit analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Overview of secondary evidence DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Independent critical appraisal using AMSTAR, primary author undertaking all data extraction using a purpose-built form. Principal findings We identified 144 potential papers, from which 33 systematic reviews were included. These reflected 714 primary studies involving 22 512 clinicians, in a range of health care settings. Implementation strategies were varied, rarely comparable, with variable outcomes. Effective implementation strategies included multifaceted interventions, interactive education and clinical reminder systems. Didactic education and passive dissemination strategies were ineffective. Cost-effectiveness studies were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Successful guideline implementation strategies should be multifaceted, and actively engage clinicians throughout the process.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.396 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 25.065 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 21.466 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.590 Zit.