Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation
263
Zitationen
12
Autoren
2011
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Developing and updating high-quality guidelines requires substantial time and resources. To reduce duplication of effort and enhance efficiency, we developed a process for guideline adaptation and assessed initial perceptions of its feasibility and usefulness. METHODS: Based on preliminary developments and empirical studies, a series of meetings with guideline experts were organised to define a process for guideline adaptation (ADAPTE) and to develop a manual and a toolkit made available on a website (http://www.adapte.org). Potential users, guideline developers and implementers, were invited to register and to complete a questionnaire evaluating their perception about the proposed process. RESULTS: The ADAPTE process consists of three phases (set-up, adaptation, finalisation), 9 modules and 24 steps. The adaptation phase involves identifying specific clinical questions, searching for, retrieving and assessing available guidelines, and preparing the draft adapted guideline. Among 330 registered individuals (46 countries), 144 completed the questionnaire. A majority found the ADAPTE process clear (78%), comprehensive (69%) and feasible (60%), and the manual useful (79%). However, 21% found the ADAPTE process complex. 44% feared that they will not find appropriate and high-quality source guidelines. DISCUSSION: A comprehensive framework for guideline adaptation has been developed to meet the challenges of timely guideline development and implementation. The ADAPTE process generated important interest among guideline developers and implementers. The majority perceived the ADAPTE process to be feasible, useful and leading to improved methodological rigour and guideline quality. However, some de novo development might be needed if no high quality guideline exists for a given topic.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.396 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 25.065 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 21.466 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.590 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1(FR)
- Centre Léon Bérard(FR)
- Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement(NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center(NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen(NL)
- University Hospital of Lausanne(CH)
- University of Lausanne(CH)
- Cancer Care Ontario(CA)
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer(CA)
- McMaster University(CA)
- BC Cancer Agency(CA)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research(CA)
- Queen's University(CA)
- Université de Sherbrooke(CA)
- Ministry of Health and Social Services(CA)
- Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne(CA)