Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Influence of systematic discrepancy in coagulation tests on clinical decision
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2012
Jahr
Abstract
Objective To investigate discrepancies of coagulation parameters in different systems,and try to standardize or calibrate these index.Methods 247 samples were collected from patients,to observe difference of PT/INR,APTT,and FIB tested in STA-R,CA7000 and ACL-Advance,and then analyzed by Student-Newman-Keuls test.INR data was divided into 3 groups:2,2-3,and3 to make further analysis by nonparameter test.Results There were significant difference in PT,APTT and FIB(F=32.570,P0.01;F=134.076,P0.01;F=99.873,P0.01)respectively.Both PT and APTT from STA-R and CA-7000 system were correlated(r=0.984 and 0.944,all P0.01).Nonparameter test showed no difference(χ2=7.583,P0.05)of INR in three levels,when system-specific ISI was used.Fibrinogen measured by Clauss were different from that of PT-derived(F=99.873,P0.01).Moreover ACL Advance and STA-R showed good correlation(r=0.909,P0.01)in Fib,especially in low fibrinogen level.Conclusions It is difficult to minimize the difference merely by a correct formula,although good correlation lies between systems.We should continue to emphasize on the reagent quality and traceability,and pay more attention on system specialty to keep accuracy of coagulation tests.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 89.932 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.052 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.891 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.463 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.123 Zit.