Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Causes for Deviations of Expert’s Conclusion in Clinical Medicine
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2006
Jahr
Abstract
Along with the perfection of construction in legislation and improvement of people’s law awareness,problems have emerged in biopsy.It’s harmful for the scientific character and credit of expert’s conclusion in clinical medicine.It also makes the work of expert evaluation in an awkward position.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.823 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.018 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.587 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.467 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.877 Zit.