Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Inverse reinforcement learning for intelligent mechanical ventilation and sedative dosing in intensive care units
66
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a promising technique to solve complex sequential decision making problems in health care domains. To ensure such applications, an explicit reward function encoding domain knowledge should be specified beforehand to indicate the goal of tasks. However, there is usually no explicit information regarding the reward function in medical records. It is then necessary to consider an approach whereby the reward function can be learned from a set of presumably optimal treatment trajectories using retrospective real medical data. This paper applies inverse RL in inferring the reward functions that clinicians have in mind during their decisions on weaning of mechanical ventilation and sedative dosing in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). METHODS: We model the decision making problem as a Markov Decision Process, and use a batch RL method, Fitted Q Iterations with Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, to learn a suitable ventilator weaning policy from real trajectories in retrospective ICU data. A Bayesian inverse RL method is then applied to infer the latent reward functions in terms of weights in trading off various aspects of evaluation criterion. We then evaluate how the policy learned using the Bayesian inverse RL method matches the policy given by clinicians, as compared to other policies learned with fixed reward functions. RESULTS: ) which is supported by previous RL methods. Moreover, by discovering the optimal weights, new effective treatment protocols can be suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Inverse RL is an effective approach to discovering clinicians' underlying reward functions for designing better treatment protocols in the ventilation weaning and sedative dosing in future ICUs.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.750 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.549 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.957 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.567 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.083 Zit.