Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Should we be afraid of medical AI?
46
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
I analyse an argument according to which medical artificial intelligence (AI) represents a threat to patient autonomy-recently put forward by Rosalind McDougall in the <i>Journal of Medical Ethics</i> The argument takes the case of IBM Watson for Oncology to argue that such technologies risk disregarding the individual values and wishes of patients. I find three problems with this argument: (1) it confuses AI with machine learning; (2) it misses machine learning's potential for personalised medicine through big data; (3) it fails to distinguish between evidence-based advice and decision-making within healthcare. I conclude that how much and which tasks we should delegate to machine learning and other technologies within healthcare and beyond is indeed a crucial question of our time, but in order to answer it, we must be careful in analysing and properly distinguish between the different systems and different delegated tasks.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.578 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.470 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.984 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.814 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.