Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Computer algorithm can match physicians’ decisions about blood transfusions
14
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Checking appropriateness of blood transfusion for quality assurance required enormous usage of time and human resources from the healthcare system. We report here a new machine learning algorithm for checking blood transfusion quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) was designed to learn an expert's judgement from 4946 clinical cases. The accuracy in predicting the blood transfusion was then reported. RESULTS: We achieved a 96.8% overall accuracy rate, with a 99% match rate to the experts' judgement on those appropriate cases and 90.9% on the inappropriate cases. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithm can accurately match to human judgement by feeding in pre-surgical information and key laboratory variables.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
1999 · 5.205 Zit.
Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial
2010 · 3.240 Zit.
Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma
2015 · 2.438 Zit.
Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma
2020 · 2.420 Zit.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
1999 · 2.045 Zit.