Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A review of archival auditing research
2.863
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2014
Jahr
Abstract
We define higher audit quality as greater assurance of high financial reporting quality. Researchers use many proxies for audit quality, with little guidance on choosing among them. We provide a framework for systematically evaluating their unique strengths and weaknesses. Because it is inextricably intertwined with financial reporting quality, audit quality also depends on firms’ innate characteristics and financial reporting systems. Our review of the models commonly used to disentangle these constructs suggests the need for better conceptual guidance. Finally, we urge more research on the role of auditor and client competency in driving audit quality.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
1997 · 16.844 Zit.
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
1992 · 15.060 Zit.
FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY
1968 · 13.445 Zit.
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
1993 · 11.382 Zit.
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
2002 · 10.176 Zit.