Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Deep Learning Application in Spinal Implant Identification
28
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Deep learning has recently been actively applied to medical images. However, despite many attempts to apply deep learning to medical images, the application has rarely been successful. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of deep learning in the medical field. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning. METHODS: For deep learning algorithm development, radiographs were retrospectively obtained from clinical cases in which the patients had lumbar spine one-segment instrument surgery. A total of 2894 lumbar spine anteroposterior (AP: 1446 cases) and lateral (1448 cases) radiographs were collected. Labeling work was conducted for five different implants. We conducted experiments using three deep learning algorithms. The traditional deep neural network model built by coding the transfer learning algorithm, Google AutoML, and Apple Create ML. Recall (sensitivity) and precision (specificity) were measured after training. RESULTS: Overall, each model performed well in identifying each pedicle screw implant. In conventional transfer learning, AP radiography showed 97.0% precision and 96.7% recall. Lateral radiography showed 98.7% precision and 98.2% recall. In Google AutoML, AP radiography showed 91.4% precision and 87.4% recall; lateral radiography showed 97.9% precision and 98.4% recall. In Apple Create ML, AP radiography showed 76.0% precision and 73.0% recall; lateral radiography showed 89.0% precision and 87.0% recall. In all deep learning algorithms, precision and recall were higher in lateral than in AP radiography. CONCLUSION: The deep learning application is effective for spinal implant identification. This demonstrates that clinicians can use ML-based deep learning applications to improve clinical practice and patient care.Level of Evidence: 3.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 14.106 Zit.
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
2020 · 8.298 Zit.
Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves
2001 · 4.093 Zit.
Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
2001 · 3.950 Zit.
Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique
1993 · 3.639 Zit.