Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
WSDM 2021 Tutorial on Systematic Challenges and Computational Solutions on Bias and Unfairness in Peer Review
5
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Peer review is the backbone of scientific research. Yet peer review is called "biased," "broken," and "unscientific" in many scientific disciplines. This problem is further compounded with the near-exponentially growing number of submissions in various computer science conferences. Due to the prevalence of "Matthew effect'' of rich getting richer in academia, any source of unfairness in the peer review system, such as those discussed in this tutorial, can considerably affect the entire career trajectory of (young) researchers.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
2004 · 47.336 Zit.
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
2020 · 36.507 Zit.
Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0
2007 · 28.954 Zit.
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners
2019 · 23.165 Zit.
Array programming with NumPy
2020 · 21.243 Zit.