Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Exploring EFL Students' Writing Performance and Their Acceptance of AI-based Automated Writing Feedback
63
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
This study examined the EFL writing performance of using AI-based writing feedback called Grammarly and students’ acceptance of this new technology. Fifty-three EFL students from two convenience sample classes in China participated in this quasi-experimental design study. They were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The students in the experimental group (EG) applied Grammarly to edit and revise their essays, while those in the control group (CG) received traditional instruction without Grammarly intervention. A total of five essays were implemented during the 16-week intervention period. EG students' perceptions of Grammarly via a survey were additionally collected by the researchers at the end of the intervention. Results from an independent t-test showed that students in the EG significantly outperformed those in the CG in respect of posttest writing performance. The effect size value of the Cohen's d = 0.603, indicating a medium effect. Results from a survey with open-ended questions showed that students appreciated the AI-based instant grammar correction given by Grammarly. The disadvantages of Grammarly and future teaching strategies in EFL writing classrooms are provided.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.400 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.261 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.695 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.506 Zit.