Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The retraction lessons that may require academic publishing to change
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
In this paper, we present some striking facts learned from a random subsampling of the global database of retracted academic papers, which have not been reported before and not discussed in the recent (famous) paper in Science by Brainard and You (Science 2019, doi:10.1126/science.aav8384). Our views then proceed to advocate several practical, and imperative, changes that can improve academic publishing, considering these insights, in line with Magdalena Skipper’s key missions in advocating open science and addressing the reproducibility crisis (Else, Nature 2018; doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05060-w).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.511 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.315 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.924 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.846 Zit.