Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018
5
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Current urology research does not consistently provide the components needed to reproduce original studies. Collaborative efforts from investigators and journal editors are needed to improve research quality while minimizing waste and patient risk.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.674 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.951 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.456 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.171 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.855 Zit.