Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Big Biological Data: Need for a Reorientation of the Governance Framework
4
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Biological data (biodata) has become a buzzword for innovations in this century. With pioneering advances in machine learning techniques and artificial intelligence, biological datasets have brought about revolutionary changes in many areas, particularly in healthcare. In this process, a host of ethical and legal issues have also come to the fore. The purpose of this paper is to address the need for a reorientation of the governance framework for human biodata. Using the case of Dinerstein v. Google, this paper argues that the data governance framework must take into account and balance interests of both fostering innovation and protecting societal values.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.005 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.585 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.410 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.781 Zit.