Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
6
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of machine learning-based methods in distinguishing melanoma and benign nevus in the relevant literature. Method: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library) were searched to retrieve the relevant studies published until March 26, 2022. The Predictive model Deviation Risk Assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the deviation risk of opposing law. Result: -index was 0.87 (0.84-0.90). Conclusion: The findings of our study showed that ML algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between melanoma and benign nevi. This suggests that state-of-the-art ML-based algorithms for distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi may be ready for clinical use. However, a large proportion of the earlier published studies had methodological flaws, such as lack of external validation and lack of clinician comparisons. The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.518 Zit.
Tumor Angiogenesis: Therapeutic Implications
1971 · 10.114 Zit.
Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation
2011 · 7.677 Zit.
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
2015 · 5.811 Zit.
Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
2017 · 5.364 Zit.