Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of artificial intelligence and human-based prediction and stratification of the risk of long-term kidney allograft failure
28
Zitationen
18
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical decisions are mainly driven by the ability of physicians to apply risk stratification to patients. However, this task is difficult as it requires complex integration of numerous parameters and is impacted by patient heterogeneity. We sought to evaluate the ability of transplant physicians to predict the risk of long-term allograft failure and compare them to a validated artificial intelligence (AI) prediction algorithm. METHODS: We randomly selected 400 kidney transplant recipients from a qualified dataset of 4000 patients. For each patient, 44 features routinely collected during the first-year post-transplant were compiled in an electronic health record (EHR). We enrolled 9 transplant physicians at various career stages. At 1-year post-transplant, they blindly predicted the long-term graft survival with probabilities for each patient. Their predictions were compared with those of a validated prediction system (iBox). We assessed the determinants of each physician's prediction using a random forest survival model. RESULTS: Among the 400 patients included, 84 graft failures occurred at 7 years post-evaluation. The iBox system demonstrates the best predictive performance with a discrimination of 0.79 and a median calibration error of 5.79%, while physicians tend to overestimate the risk of graft failure. Physicians' risk predictions show wide heterogeneity with a moderate intraclass correlation of 0.58. The determinants of physicians' prediction are disparate, with poor agreement regardless of their clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the overall limited performance and consistency of physicians to predict the risk of long-term graft failure, demonstrated by the superior performances of the iBox. This study supports the use of a companion tool to help physicians in their prognostic judgement and decision-making in clinical care.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risks of Death, Cardiovascular Events, and Hospitalization
2004 · 11.294 Zit.
J Heart Lung Transplant 2021;40(4).
2021 · 6.869 Zit.
Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric Transplant
1999 · 5.275 Zit.
Islet Transplantation in Seven Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using a Glucocorticoid-Free Immunosuppressive Regimen
2000 · 5.249 Zit.
Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure
2020 · 4.896 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Inserm(FR)
- Université Paris Cité(FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris(FR)
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center(FR)
- Hôpital Saint-Louis(FR)
- Miami Transplant Institute(US)
- University of California, Los Angeles(US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center(US)
- Bicêtre Hospital(FR)
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou(FR)
- Hôpital Européen(FR)
- Sun Yat-sen University(CN)
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University(CN)
- Clínica Alemana(CL)
- Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão(BR)
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo(BR)