Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Learning to Live with Strange Error: Beyond Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence Ethics
9
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
In such papers, the technical and regulatory strategies are frequently analyzed in detail, but the concept of trustworthy AI is not. As a result, it remains unclear. This paper lays out a variety of possible interpretations of the concept and concludes that none of them is appropriate. The central problem is that, by framing the ethics of AI in terms of trustworthiness, we reinforce unjustified anthropocentric assumptions that stand in the way of clear analysis. Furthermore, even if we insist on a purely epistemic interpretation of the concept, according to which trustworthiness just means measurable reliability, it turns out that the analysis will, nevertheless, suffer from a subtle form of anthropocentrism. The paper goes on to develop the concept of strange error, which serves both to sharpen the initial diagnosis of the inadequacy of trustworthy AI and to articulate the novel epistemological situation created by the use of AI. The paper concludes with a discussion of how strange error puts pressure on standard practices of assessing moral culpability, particularly in the context of medicine.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.786 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.893 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.541 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.314 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.259 Zit.