Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Student and Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing
10
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can write poetry and news articles that go undetected by human readers. Can students use AI to write college assignments that go undetected by their professors? Past and current perceptions of AI in education have differed; while some people view AI as a tool, others view it as a threat to learning. We surveyed 83 students and 82 faculty, providing them with 4 writing samples, 3 generated by undergraduate students and 1 generated by the AI-chatbot, ChatGPT-3. We found that neither faculty nor students could detect AI-generated writing at above chance levels. Faculty and students had similar opinions on the ethicality of various uses of AI technology and how much these uses are likely to compromise learning. Faculty reported a high level of concern regarding the potential effects that AI could have on their pedagogical practices. Prior experience with ChatGPT-3 and analyzing the structure and organization of the response was found to improve detection ability in faculty, suggesting that increased exposure and domain-specific analysis may be beneficial in the detection of AI in students’ writing.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.418 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.288 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.726 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.516 Zit.