Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Predicting Miscarriage and Stillbirth Using Weighted Ensemble Machine Learning [ID: 1338167]
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prediction of miscarriage and stillbirth remains a clinical challenge. Prior efforts to use machine learning tools have not used an ensemble weighted machine learning approach, called “super learner,” which offers the opportunity to improve prediction performance by aggregating the outputs of constituent machine learning models and preferentially weighting the highest-performing models. METHODS: Data were obtained from hospital-wide electronic health records from a large academic institution. The sample comprised 13,337 patients who delivered between 2008 and 2019, 6,932 of whom experienced a miscarriage or stillbirth. Phecodes for ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM were used to define miscarriage and stillbirth and create comorbidity categories. The constituent models of the super learner were XGBoost, random forest, a regularized generalized linear model (both lasso and ridge regressions), and a support vector machine. The objective of this study was to develop a super learner algorithm to predict miscarriage and stillbirth. RESULTS: The super learner model predicted miscarriage and stillbirth classification with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 and an accuracy of 92%. It used two models: random forest, weighted at 73%, and SVM, weighted at 27%. The most highly weighted predictors were amniotic cavity abnormalities, pelvic soft tissue abnormalities, and preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: A super learner performs comparably to other models in the literature. External validation is warranted. The promising results suggest that a super learner model can be used as a clinical decision support tool, supplementing clinical judgement in predicting miscarriage and stillbirth.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
2012 · 14.220 Zit.
Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
2018 · 8.618 Zit.
The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD)
1991 · 5.049 Zit.
“Gray's Anatomy”
1985 · 4.547 Zit.
Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study
1997 · 4.062 Zit.