Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Maintaining Quality and Accuracy in Ophthalmology Academic Research: The Importance of Traditional Peer Review
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
In the last few months, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chatbots have gained significant attention and recognition as technological advancements that could transform various fields, including academic research and ophthalmology practice. The traditional peer review process, which has been a cornerstone of academic research for centuries, is no exception. Human reviewers, who received no monetary honorarium, dedicated their own time and effort in evaluating submitted articles to ensure quality and accuracy. However, the rise of AI and chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) has sparked discussions about whether peer reviewers could spot the authors on using these tools in their submitted work to ophthalmology journals.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
2016 · 7.293 Zit.
Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2014 · 5.117 Zit.
Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature for Reporting Clinical Data. Results of the First International Workshop
2005 · 4.284 Zit.
Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010
2011 · 3.770 Zit.
Ranibizumab versus Verteporfin for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
2006 · 3.481 Zit.