Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
GRADE Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2009-2021)
7
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Whereas GRADE is increasingly being applied for rating the certainty of evidence, systematic reviews published in the urological literature frequently have not followed established criteria for applying or using GRADE. There is a need for better training of authors and editors, as well as for a GRADE reporting checklist for systematic review authors.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.332 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.929 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.362 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.124 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.792 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Minnesota(US)
- Yonsei University(KR)
- Evidence Based Research (United States)(US)
- Convergence(US)
- Chonnam National University Hospital(KR)
- Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital(KR)
- Chosun University(KR)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center(US)
- Humanitas University(IT)
- Cochrane(CA)
- Impact(CA)
- Department of Health Research
- McMaster University(CA)
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System(US)