Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence–based three-dimensional templating for total joint arthroplasty planning: a scoping review
23
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of research on the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating in preoperative planning of total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: This scoping review followed the PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and five stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. Studies of patients undergoing primary or revision joint arthroplasty surgery that utilised AI-based 3D templating for surgical planning were included. Outcome measures included dataset and model development characteristics, AI performance metrics, and time performance. After AI-based 3D planning, the accuracy of component size and placement estimation and postoperative outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria including a focus on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based AI templating for use in hip or knee arthroplasty. AI-based 3D templating systems reduced surgical planning time and improved implant size/position and imaging feature estimation compared to conventional radiographic templating. Several components of data processing and model development and testing were insufficiently covered in the studies included in this scoping review. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based 3D templating systems have the potential to improve preoperative planning for joint arthroplasty surgery. This technology offers more accurate and personalized preoperative planning, which has potential to improve functional outcomes for patients. However, deficiencies in several key areas, including data handling, model development, and testing, can potentially hinder the reproducibility and reliability of the methods proposed. As such, further research is needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of these systems.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 6.884 Zit.
Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
1994 · 5.493 Zit.
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 5.436 Zit.
Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries
1985 · 4.562 Zit.
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
1989 · 4.527 Zit.