Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Systematic review of machine-learning models in orthopaedic trauma
14
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The results of this study showed that despite a myriad of potential clinically useful applications, a substantial part of ML studies in orthopaedic trauma lack transparent reporting, and are at high risk of bias. These problems must be resolved by following established guidelines to instil confidence in ML models among patients and clinicians. Otherwise, there will remain a sizeable gap between the development of ML prediction models and their clinical application in our day-to-day orthopaedic trauma practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
2015 · 7.243 Zit.
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
2006 · 4.625 Zit.
Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
2014 · 4.040 Zit.
Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025
2006 · 4.010 Zit.
Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient
2016 · 3.869 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University Medical Center Groningen(NL)
- University of Groningen(NL)
- Harvard University(US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- Utrecht University(NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)
- Flinders University(AU)
- Orthopaedic Research(GB)
- Candid(US)
- Marymount University(US)
- Delft University of Technology(NL)
- Flinders Medical Centre(AU)