Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of Reliability, Repeatability, Robustness, and Confidence of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a Radiology Board–style Examination
70
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Default GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 were reliably accurate over three attempts at answering radiology board–style multiple-choice questions but had poor repeatability and robustness and were frequently overconfident, limiting usability without domain-specific optimization.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.778 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.690 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.259 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.901 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.