Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Reporting Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence Studies in Healthcare (for Both Conventional and Large Language Models): What’s New in 2024
24
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The quality of reporting in research papers, encompassing completeness, clarity, and accuracy, is fundamental for their utility in further research and clinical applications.Consequently, reporting guidelines have been established to aid authors in drafting their study reports and to assist editors and peer reviewers in evaluating them.Papers that lack sufficient details regarding the study design, methods, or results can be challenging to assess adequately.Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important topic in clinical research and naturally, multiple guidelines for reporting clinical studies involving AI in healthcare have been introduced, with some recognized as more significant than others [1][2][3].Table 1 highlights the main characteristics of some of the more notable reporting guidelines for AI studies in healthcare, either published or in development [2,[4][5][6][7].This brief article aims to provide a concise summary of the key updates to these guidelines for 2024, while also addressing important issues that remain
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.496 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.386 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.848 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.562 Zit.