Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools for Addressing Clinical Queries: ChatGPT Versus Google Gemini
12
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based text generators, such as ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Google Bard (now Google Gemini), have demonstrated proficiency in predicting words and providing responses to various questions. However, their performance in answering clinical queries has not been well assessed. This comparative analysis aimed to assess the capabilities of ChatGPT and Google Gemini in addressing clinical questions. METHOD: Separate interactions with ChatGPT and Google Gemini were conducted to obtain responses to the clinical question, posed in a PICOT (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) format. To ascertain the accuracy of the information provided by the AI chat bots, a thorough examination of full-text articles was conducted. RESULTS: Although ChatGPT exhibited relative accuracy in generating bibliographic information, it displayed some inconsistencies in clinical content. Conversely, Google Gemini generated citations and summaries that were entirely fabricated. CONCLUSION: .
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.646 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.554 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.071 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.851 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.