Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT versus expert feedback on clinical reasoning questions and their effect on learning: a randomized controlled trial
29
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
ChatGPT-generated feedback can be an effective alternative to expert feedback in improving clinical reasoning skills in medical students, particularly in resource-constrained settings with limited expert availability. However, AI-generated feedback may lack the nuance needed for more complex cases, emphasizing the need for expert review. Additionally, exposure to the drawbacks in AI-generated feedback can enhance students' critical approach towards AI-generated educational content.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.598 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.840 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.642 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.484 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.153 Zit.