Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence as a Discriminator of Competence in Urological Training: Are We There?
4
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Despite what seems to be similar performance on ChatGPT MCQs and the overall examination, ChatGPT MCQs tend not to be highly discriminating. Poorly phrased questions with potential for artificial intelligence hallucinations are ever present. Careful vetting for quality of ChatGPT questions should be undertaken before their use on assessments in urology training examinations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Categorical Data Analysis
1991 · 9.092 Zit.
Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease
1998 · 3.937 Zit.
ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK AND ITS APPLICATION TO SCREENING FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS
1994 · 2.669 Zit.
2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
2019 · 2.455 Zit.
Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents.
1994 · 2.270 Zit.