Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating photographic authenticity: How well do ChatGPT 4o and Gemini distinguish between real and AI-generated images?
2
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, differentiating between actual and AI-generated images has become an increasingly difficult task. The present exploratory research looks at the capacity of two leading AI models, ChatGPT and Gemini, to correctly classify genuine vs. synthetic photographs in a variety of categories, including wildlife, portraiture, and abstract art. The present research evaluates the accuracy, mistake rates, and handling of complex visual content of both models, shedding light on their strengths and limits and providing significant insights into their possible uses in combatting visual falsehood.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The spread of true and false news online
2018 · 8.109 Zit.
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
2010 · 6.666 Zit.
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
2017 · 6.437 Zit.
Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception
1983 · 6.270 Zit.
The Matthew Effect in Science
1968 · 6.173 Zit.