Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Legality of Employing Artificial Intelligence for Writing Academic Papers in Education
2
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Including artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing has spurred a critical review of its ethical and legal ramifications in learning environments. As companies embrace AI tools like ChatGPT, questions about authorship, intellectual property, and academic integrity have become central concerns that need careful examination, as institutions do. This paper explores the changing definition of AI and its ability to execute tasks usually connected with human intelligence, generating serious ques-tions about originality and ethical standards in academic work. The conversation emphasizes the need for educational institutions to create explicit structures that handle the complexity of AI-assisted writing preserving academic integrity and encouraging creative ideas. Underlined in the paper are ethical conundrums created by AI-generated content, especially concerning openness, accuracy, and bias potential. It questions who owns AI-generated works and how conventional ideas of creative agency must be reassessed because of these developments, so challenging the muddy waters of authorship and intellectual property rights. Beyond only legal concerns, the implications of AI’s presence in academic writing force a review of pedagogical approaches and the possible effects on critical thinking and independent research skills among students. In the end, this work supports a sensible strategy that welcomes AI’s transforming power while protecting the fundamental values of academic integrity and rigor. It asks teachers, lawyers, and legislators to work together to negotiate AI’s complex legal terrain in academia so that the educational experience stays strong and morally sound for the next generations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms
2019 · 1.135 Zit.
Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies
2015 · 553 Zit.
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
1967 · 418 Zit.
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
2023 · 387 Zit.
Legal Foundations of Capitalism
2017 · 337 Zit.