Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can we rely on artificial intelligence to guide antimicrobial therapy? A systematic literature review
15
Zitationen
20
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making. Results: Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses. Conclusions: AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
2000 · 16.888 Zit.
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis
2022 · 14.976 Zit.
Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance
2011 · 13.778 Zit.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing
2001 · 9.766 Zit.
Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis
2017 · 5.996 Zit.
Autoren
- Sulwan Algain
- Alexandre R. Marra
- Takaaki Kobayashi
- Pedro S. Marra
- Patrícia Deffune Celeghini
- Mariana Kim Hsieh
- Mohammed Abdu Shatari
- Samiyah Althagafi
- Maria Alayed
- Jamila I Ranavaya
- Nicole A Boodhoo
- Nicholas O Meade
- Daniel Fu
- Mindy Sampson
- Guillermo Rodriguez‐Nava
- Alex Zimmet
- David Ha
- Mohammed Alsuhaibani
- Boglarka S. Huddleston
- Jorge Salinas
Institutionen
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre(SA)
- Stanford University(US)
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein(BR)
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics(US)
- University of Kentucky(US)
- University of California, San Francisco(US)
- King Saud Medical City(SA)
- King Abdul Aziz University Hospital(SA)
- University of Iowa(US)
- University of Chicago(US)