Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini in Generating Patient Education Materials for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (Semaglutide, Liraglutide, Tirzepatide): A Cross-Sectional Study
2
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Google Gemini provided more readable content, while ChatGPT produced slightly more detailed information. Both AI tools were effective in generating reliable patient education materials for GLP-1 receptor agonists. However, future research should incorporate more AI tools and updated versions for comprehensive analysis.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.402 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.270 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.702 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.507 Zit.