OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 12.05.2026, 04:22

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Mental health practitioners’ perceptions and adoption intentions of AI-enabled technologies: an international mixed-methods study

2025·10 Zitationen·BMC Health Services ResearchOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

10

Zitationen

4

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As mental health disorders continue to surge, exceeding the capacity of available therapeutic resources, the emergence of technologies enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions for supporting and delivering patient care. However, there is limited research on mental health practitioners' understanding, familiarity, and adoption intentions regarding these AI technologies. We, therefore, examined to what extent practitioners' characteristics are associated with their learning and use intentions of AI technologies in four application domains (diagnostics, treatment, feedback, and practice management). These characteristics include medical AI readiness with its subdimensions, AI anxiety with its subdimensions, technology self-efficacy, affinity for technology interaction, and professional identification. METHODS: Mixed-methods data from N = 392 German and US practitioners, encompassing psychotherapists (in training), psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists, was analyzed. A deductive thematic approach was employed to evaluate mental health practitioners' understanding and familiarity with AI technologies. Additionally, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationship between practitioners' characteristics and their adoption intentions for different technologies. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis unveiled a substantial gap in familiarity with AI applications in mental healthcare among practitioners. While some practitioner characteristics were only associated with specific AI application areas (e.g., cognitive readiness with learning intentions for feedback tools), we found that learning intention, ethical knowledge, and affinity for technology interaction were relevant across all four application areas, underscoring their relevance in the adoption of AI technologies in mental healthcare. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this pre-registered study underscores the importance of recognizing the interplay between diverse factors for training opportunities and consequently, a streamlined implementation of AI-enabled technologies in mental healthcare.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen