Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Boon or a Bane?
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced tools like ChatGPT, transforming academic writing by streamlining tasks such as summarization, citation generation, and linguistic refinement. While it enhances efficiency and supports non-native English speakers and early-career researchers, its adoption raises ethical concerns, including risks of plagiarism, over-reliance, and diminished critical thinking. Furthermore, ChatGPT's limitations in originality, contextual understanding, and factual accuracy highlight the need for vigilant oversight and clear ethical guidelines. This paper critically examines ChatGPT’s dual role in academia, offering recommendations to maximize its benefits while maintaining scholarly integrity. When used responsibly, ChatGPT has the potential to complement human intellect and advance academic writing practices.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.561 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.452 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.948 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.797 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.