Characteristics and perceived suitability of artificial intelligence-driven sports coaches: a pilot study on psychological and perceptual factors

Abstract

Introduction: Access to human sports coaches is often limited by financial and logistical barriers, leading to disparities in the availability of high-quality coaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) coaches powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) might offer promising means to augment human coaches by supporting or autonomously performing specific coaching tasks within targeted domains. This study investigated AI coaches' associated attributes and perceived suitability in training contexts by addressing three primary questions: (A) Which attributes on a semantic differential scale effectively describe the dimensions of AI coaches in the context of training support? (B) Do participants with varying perceptions of AI suitability for their training practices differ in the attributes they associate with AI coaches, as measured by a semantic differential scale? (C) Do different individual achievement motives (AMS)-Sport influence the perception of AI coaches' suitability? Methods: The study comprised two parts. The first involves the development of a semantic differential scale to quantify the perceptions of AI coaches and an analysis of how different AI coach personalities, designed using an LLM, are perceived concerning their training suitability and how achievement motives influence these perceptions. Six distinct AI coach personalities were created to reflect the diverse coaching styles. Results: . The results indicated that coaches rated as more suitable exhibited supportive traits, such as motivation and goal orientation, compared to those rated less suitable. Participants with a lower Fear of Failure (FoF) also tended to rate AI coaches as more appropriate. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of aligning AI coaches' characteristics with their motivational profiles to improve user engagement.

Ähnliche Arbeiten