OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 23.05.2026, 07:11

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Comparative analysis of AI algorithms on real medical data for chronic pain detection

2025·3 Zitationen·International Journal of Medical InformaticsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

3

Zitationen

6

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

Chronic pain is a pervasive healthcare challenge with profound implications for patient well-being, clinical decision-making, and resource allocation. Traditional detection methods often rely on subjective assessments and manual documentation review, which can be time-consuming and unpredictable. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare offers a promising approach to enhance chronic pain management through automated and standardized text analysis. This study examines the use of AI in detecting chronic pain from Italian clinical notes. We leverage machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to better understand how chronic pain is documented, thereby enabling efficient, data-driven solutions in nursing and medical practice. We trained XGBoost, Gradient Boosting (GBM), and BERT-based models (BioBit, bert-base-italian-xxl) on 1,008 annotated Italian clinical notes. Input texts were encoded using TF-IDF, Word2Vec, or FastText for tree-based models and tokenized for transformers. While models were trained on full notes, evaluation was performed on fragmented text to simulate realistic usage. Bayesian optimization and stratified cross-validation over 30 trials ensured robust hyperparameter tuning and performance estimates. Our AI-based approach achieved high overall accuracy. In particular, XGBoost with TF-IDF embeddings yielded the best performance, reaching an F1-score of 0.92 ± 0.01, with precision at 94%, sensitivity at 91%, and specificity at 93%. The chronic pain notes contained fewer total words (73.91 vs. 119.86, p = 0.0021) and unique words (57.27 vs. 92.78, p = 0.0006) than non-chronic pain notes, underscoring the significance of concise, keyword-rich clinical documentation. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of AI in identifying chronic pain cases from fragmentary clinical notes. By focusing on concise, keyword-oriented text, this work establishes a solid baseline for domain-specific NLP approaches in healthcare. The proposed method reduces the burden of manual review, facilitates real-time decision support, and may standardize chronic pain assessment processes. Furthermore, we plan to explore new embedding techniques specifically designed for short, context-limited clinical notes, where dynamic contextual models (e.g., BERT) often encounter challenges due to insufficient extended textual context. • Problem or Issue. Chronic pain detection often relies on subjective assessments and manual interpretation of clinical documentation, which can be time-consuming and prone to variability. • What is Already Known. AI methodologies have been explored for chronic pain detection, but their application to real-world medical and nursing notes, especially in Italian, remains under-researched. • What this Paper Adds. This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of AI, particularly XGBoost with TF-IDF embeddings, in accurately identifying chronic pain cases from concise, keyword- rich clinical notes. It highlights the potential for scalable, data-driven solutions in healthcare. • Who would benefit from the new knowledge in this paper. Healthcare professionals, including clinicians and nurses, who aim to improve chronic pain assessment accuracy and streamline workflows, would benefit from the findings in this paper.

Ähnliche Arbeiten