Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Lost in Translation: Preoperative Orthopaedic Education Materials Significantly Exceed Recommended Reading Levels
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background: National guidelines recommend that patient education materials are written at or below a 6th-grade reading level. Poor understanding of their care plan after orthopaedic surgery has been associated with worse outcomes, including lower surgical satisfaction and higher postoperative complications. This study evaluates the language availability and readability of orthopaedic patient education materials published by Elsevier and distributed via Epic, the most widely used electronic health record system in the United States. Methods: -test, whereas trends over time were assessed using linear regression. Results: Among 806 patient education documents, English and Spanish versions were available for all documents, but other languages were available for less than 30% of the documents. The mean readability grade level was 8.6 for English and 5.8 for Spanish documents, with 100% and 27% exceeding the recommended 6th-grade level, respectively. Preoperative documents consistently demonstrated the highest grade levels, whereas rehabilitation documents demonstrated lower grade levels across both English and Spanish documents (p < 0.05). Furthermore, musculoskeletal oncology documents consistently had the highest grade levels across document subspecialties (p < 0.05). Easy-to-read versions were only available for 11% of documents and reduced grade level to 7.4 for English and 5.5 for Spanish documents, although 94% and 4% still exceeded the recommended 6th-grade level, respectively. No significant changes in readability were observed over time. Conclusions: Elsevier's orthopaedic patient education materials, specifically related to preoperative information, are frequently written above recommended reading levels. The scarcity of easy-to-read versions further restricts their availability accessibility. To improve patient comprehension and adherence, efforts should focus on increasing the availability of simplified materials and expanding translation efforts. Artificial intelligence driven solutions may offer a scalable approach to addressing these deficiencies. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
2006 · 6.256 Zit.
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
2004 · 6.244 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.937 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.307 Zit.
Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century
2000 · 5.015 Zit.