Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Cochrane Authors' and ChatGPT's Risk of Bias Assessments
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study shows that ChatGPT-4o can perform risk of bias assessments using RoB 2 with fair to moderate agreement with human reviewers. While AI-assisted risk of bias assessment remains imperfect, advancements in prompt engineering and model refinement may enhance performance. Future research should explore standardised prompts and investigate interrater reliability among human reviewers to provide a more robust comparison.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.674 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.951 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.456 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.171 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.855 Zit.