Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How (not) to use the AI Assessment Scale
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The rapid uptake of generative AI (GenAI) has exposed weaknesses in assessment design and policy. The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) offers a practical way to align permitted AI use with intended learning outcomes. However, as the scale has grown, we have seen implementations that we feel could be improved: unenforceable ‘No AI’ labels, assigning labels to existing assessments without changing the assessments themselves, equity blind spots, and control-first policies that encourage ‘performance theatre’. This commentary outlines our recommendations for AIAS implementations that replace detection with design: selecting levels by outcome and conditions, requiring light process evidence where suitable, adjusting criteria to assess judgement and voice, sequencing evidence across time, and planning for equitable access. We highlight sector-specific considerations for implementing and adapting the AIAS for K-12, higher education, Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET), English as a Foreign Language (EFL), and English for Academic Purposes (EAP).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.697 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.602 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.127 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.872 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.