Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Theoretical appraisal of explanatory paradigms for artificial intelligence usage by medical doctors
2
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical practice has generated both enthusiasm and hesitation among physicians, yet no comprehensive theoretical appraisal has systematically evaluated the paradigms used to explain this phenomenon. This study aims to critically assess existing theories, conceptual models, and frameworks to determine their capacity to explain AI acceptance and resistance among medical doctors. Methods: A structured critical examination was conducted using the developed T2P2 criteria, which categorizes 12 evaluation dimensions into theoretical, technological, professional, and personal groups. A structured paradigm search across Scopus and Web of Science research articles identified 28 peer-reviewed studies that applied 21 distinct paradigms to examine AI usage by physicians. Each paradigm was then evaluated using a trichotomous rating scale alongside interpretive analysis to assess both quantitative alignment and conceptual coherence. Results: Among the evaluated paradigms, the Social Cognitive Theory, Self-Determination Theory, and Dual Factor Model consistently met the T2P2 criteria, demonstrating strong explanatory sufficiency across internal psychological mechanisms and external structural factors. Other paradigms, while useful in specific contexts, often exhibited insufficiency in intelligent systems relevance, complimentary duality, professional functionality, specialization applicability, pedagogical usability, and healthcare context specificity. Conclusion: This study clarifies the theoretical robustness of existing paradigms in explaining AI usage among medical doctors, highlighting the need for integrative paradigms that account for both cognitive-motivational and socio-technical factors. The findings inform IS researchers, clinicians, and policymakers on selecting appropriate explanatory paradigms for responsible AI integration in healthcare.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.778 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.690 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.259 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.901 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.