Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence in Digestive Endoscopy Training—The Past, Present, and Future
5
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping gastrointestinal endoscopy, yet its role in training remains unexplored. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on AI-assisted endoscopy training, addresses potential drawbacks, and envisions future directions. METHODS: This narrative review was performed via a systematic MEDLINE search (including articles from inception to January 2025), with search terms covering 'AI', 'endoscopy,' and 'training.' Studies were excluded if they were reviews, letters, editorials or comments; focused solely on model development; lacked a training component; or were limited to simple comparisons between the performance of endoscopists and AI systems. After screening 1443 records, 27 articles were included in this review. RESULTS: AI demonstrates potential in enhancing the training of various types of endoscopy (including luminal, hepatobiliary, capsule, and therapeutic endoscopy) by improving quality metrics, enhancing lesion detection, and guiding anatomical landmark recognition, yet the current applications are mainly task-based. Future AI must evolve to provide comprehensive training and personalized performance tracking to endoscopists of different levels of experience. Further studies are needed to assess objective educational outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Key concerns for AI adoption, including deskilling, over-reliance, ethical considerations, and practicality, should be addressed through structured implementation, quality assurance, and regulatory framework. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, AI can augment endoscopy training by improving skill acquisition and procedural quality, yet significant gaps remain. More research is needed to support its widespread integration.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.581 Zit.
The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
2023 · 3.007 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.810 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.263 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.753 Zit.