Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Advancing Sustainable Development Goal 4 – a comparative analysis of large language models
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose This study investigates how generative AI models (ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini) can be systematically integrated into curriculum design using Hilda Taba’s inductive model. Addressing Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), it introduces the EduCompass framework to enhance inclusivity and instructional quality. Design/methodology/approach A structured needs assessment with MBA students identified skill gaps in analytics and AI ethics. Deep research prompts were fed into ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini to generate curriculum components. Outputs were evaluated on accuracy, relevance and clarity by academic experts and analyzed for readability (Flesch–Kincaid), semantic similarity (cosine) and statistical significance (ANOVA). Findings ChatGPT produced the most readable and pedagogically sound content, followed by Gemini and Claude. ChatGPT also received the highest expert ratings for clarity, accuracy and relevance, with significant differences confirmed via ANOVA. Cosine similarity showed the highest conceptual overlap between ChatGPT and Gemini. Originality/value This is a study to empirically compare AI-generated curricula across multiple LLMs within a classical curriculum framework. EduCompass offers a replicable model for AI-enhanced, SDG-aligned curriculum design in higher education.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.400 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.261 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.695 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.506 Zit.