Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Enhancing Academic Feedback through GenAI Prompt Engineering
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study investigates the efficacy of various prompt engineering frameworks for providing feedback on students’ academic assignments using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT and Gemini. The focus is on developing effective prompts for formative assessment feedback. Faculty instructors often face substantial challenges in managing the heavy workload of grading a large volume of assignments within limited timeframes. To mitigate these challenges, educators are increasingly turning to GenAI tools to streamline the feedback process.The methodology involved a systematic literature review to list the 11 prompt engineering frameworks and further interact with ChatGPT and Gemini to develop and compare feedback from these frameworks. Structured prompts were crafted, refined, and tested across various academic scenarios to assess their effectiveness, ensuring the findings are relevant and applicable in real-world educational contexts.The results show that tailored prompt engineering can significantly enhance the efficiency and personalization of assignment feedback, potentially transforming how academics evaluate student work. By integrating these advanced GenAI tools, educators can better manage their workload while maintaining the quality of feedback provided to students. This study contributes to the emerging field of AI in education by offering practical insights into the application of GenAI tools and developing prompt engineering frameworks that enhance academic feedback mechanisms.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
1988 · 8.102 Zit.
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
1975 · 8.059 Zit.
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2013)
2013 · 6.258 Zit.
Learning from delayed rewards
1989 · 5.471 Zit.
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?
2019 · 4.930 Zit.