Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How AI social responsibility shapes consumers’ brand advocacy
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This paper employs a mixed-methods research approach to investigate the dimensional structure of AI social responsibility and its influence mechanism on consumer brand advocacy. First, based on in-depth interviews with 20 Chinese consumers (conducted January–February 2024) and grounded theory analysis, AI social responsibility(AISR) was classified into two dimensions: technical AISR and institutional AISR. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural validity tests were further applied to questionnaire data collected from an online survey platform (Credamo) in 2024 to validate the rationality of these dimensions and their scales. Second, this paper found through two experimental studies that institutional AISR is more likely to inspire consumers’ brand advocacy than technical AISR. Moreover, perceived AI credibility and perceived AI empathy mediate the impact of AI social responsibility on consumers’ brand advocacy, where AI literacy positively moderates these effects. This paper not only enriches a two-dimensional conceptualization (Technical vs. Institutional AISR) and a validated measurement scale for AISR in the consumer context but also reveals the dual mediating pathways (perceived AI credibility for Technical AISR and perceived AI empathy for Institutional AISR) through which distinct AISR dimensions differentially drive consumer brand advocacy. Furthermore, it uncovers the critical moderating role of AI literacy in amplifying these effects. These findings extend prior CSR and AI-related consumer behavior literature by delineating the nuanced mechanisms and boundary conditions of AISR’s impact.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.568 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.551 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.399 Zit.