Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Early Adopters of AI and Gender Disparities in Health Outcomes
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
While artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes for all individuals, including women, there are several areas where gender disparities persist, and AI may be involved in mitigating or exacerbating them. Amid the ever-increasing pervasiveness of AI in the health sector, it is imperative to examine how AI intersects with gender disparities in health outcomes globally, especially in the early adopter countries. Gender disparities in health outcomes are a crucial concern that gets manifested in differences in health status, access to healthcare, and health-related experiences between men and women. Gender disparities in health outcomes highlight unequal distributions of health resources, opportunities, and risks based on gender. This study looked at how investments in healthcare that uses AI affect the health outcomes of women in early adopter countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, China, Japan, and Israel) between 2014 and 2023. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess the cumulative effect of AI investments on health outcomes of women. The study found that the F-value (4.139) is low and not statistically significant (p = 0.376), highlighting the fact that even in early adopter countries, investments in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare AI do not have a statistically substantial bearing on the overall health outcomes for women, making gender disparity in the countries. These findings show that in order to guarantee quantifiable and significant gains in health outcomes, AI investments in healthcare must take a more focused and evidence-based approach.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.493 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.377 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.835 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.555 Zit.